Acemoglu and Robinson arguments – 2022 best

Acemoglu and Robinson arguments

This paper focuses on analyzing Acemoglu and Robinson  arguments up through Chapter 4 from the book Why Nations Fail. In this paper, you will be analyzing (that is, breaking apart, identifying, and, to some degree, evaluating) the parts of their argument.

Acemoglu and Robinson arguments

Prompt for Paper 2 2nd Paper – Academic Analysis..  Analyze Acemoglu’s and Robinson’s arguments up through Chapter 4 from the book Why Nations Fail. In this paper, you will be analyzing (that is, breaking apart, identifying, and, to some degree, evaluating) the parts of their argument. Identify the features of their overall and supporting arguments, using the vocabulary of A Rhetoric of Argument by Jeanne Fahnestock and Marie Secor as much as possible. Explain what these writers are doing when they make these arguments. What makes this different from a summary is the fact that you are identifying the authors’ rhetorical movements with formal vocabulary. And explaining why you believe their arguments are what you say they are.

Acemoglu and Robinson arguments

These arguments should be throughout your paper, not in a separate section. Use your summarizing abilities to explain the rhetoric of Acemoglu and Robinson, but do not stop there. Identify the appropriate names of certain aspects of the arguments, and then make your case (for or against, partially-for, partially-against). At the end of your paper, and taking up at least one page write your assessment their arguments so far in this book. Do you agree with them, or not? Explain why the authors are convincing or if they are not, in your estimation, based on what you have learned about argument.

Acemoglu and Robinson arguments

Again, use as much of the vocabulary and ideas presented in Chapters 1-3 of Rhteoric as you can. 6-8 pages, no outside research necessary (since you are analyzing and evaluating the arguments based on their adherence to rhetoric as explained in A Rhetoric of Argument, not against other sources). Double-spaced (no spaces between paragraphs), 12-point font, 1-inch margins. Include a Works Cited page (Nations and Rhetoric). https://youtu.be/KLdnISYOUo4

Acemoglu and Robinson arguments

The introductory paragraph introduces at least some of the formal terms from A Rhetoric of Argument. The Thesis Statement is a summing up of the analysis of the parts of Acemoglu’s and Robinson’s arguments. That the writer has chosen and perhaps contains some judgment about the overall quality thereof. Development The paper carefully analyzes, using formal rhetorical terms from Chapters 1 and 2 of A Rhetoric of Argument. Several components of the arguments of Chapters 1-6 of Why Nations Fail.

Additional Files

order now with paypal
Powered by WordPress